news-31072024-043800

Former BBC presenter Huw Edwards has recently pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children. The 62-year-old admitted to these offenses during his appearance at Westminster Magistrates’ Court. It was revealed in court that Edwards had communicated with an individual online who had sent him a total of 377 sexual images, with 41 of them being indecent images of children. Shockingly, one of the indecent images found on his phone depicted a child as young as seven years old.

It is crucial to understand the legal definition of ‘making indecent images of children’ to avoid any misinterpretation. Contrary to what some may think, this offense does not imply that Mr. Edwards himself created the images or used any form of AI technology to produce them. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has acknowledged that this offense has been subject to various interpretations over the years. According to online guidance from the CPS, ‘making indecent images’ can encompass actions such as opening an email attachment containing such images, downloading them from a website, or receiving them through social media, regardless of whether they were unsolicited or part of a group.

In his defense, barrister Philip Evans KC emphasized that there is no evidence to suggest that Mr. Edwards actively created any images himself. Additionally, thorough searches of his devices did not yield any incriminating material apart from the images received via a WhatsApp chat. It is important to note that Mr. Edwards did not retain, share, or seek similar images from any other source.

The Sentencing Council outlines three categories of indecent images to differentiate the severity of such offenses. Category A images are considered the most severe, involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual acts with animals, or sadism. Category B images consist of non-penetrative sexual activity, while category C images are indecent but do not meet the criteria for A or B. The images sent to Mr. Edwards included seven category A, 12 category B, and 22 category C images.

Mr. Edwards is scheduled to be sentenced on 16 September at the same court, facing a potential jail term for the crimes he has pleaded guilty to. It is a stark reminder of the consequences of engaging in illegal activities involving indecent images of children, regardless of one’s public standing or profession.